JM?
 Morning.
 Morning.
 Good morning.
 Afternoon over here, but...
 Afternoon for some reason, yeah, I was about to say.
 Look at this, a fleet of DUI cats.
 Oh, there ain't a camera. Let me change the camera.
 All right, let's give it a moment.
 There we go, Keenan, did the alert already go up?
 All right.
 That's only a couple of seconds, yeah.
 Yeah, we've got 37, so I'm going to let that... I know that there was about 60-some-odd folks that were...
 Had the event marked?
 So one minute, I think we can kick off.
 You want to wait a couple of minutes, Scott, or you think we should go for it?
 It looks like people are still frequently...
 Yeah, I think it's all right, you know what, I think it's okay for us to get going here.
 For those in the U.S., hope you had a good fourth, for those who are watching the couple last night.
 Such a shame.
 Let's talk about more optimistic things now.
 So, Mari, do you want to kick us off here today?
 Yeah, let me get started.
 So, well, thank you so much, everybody, for joining.
 It's great to see the participation.
 It's great to see the people are still coming in.
 And the numbers continue to grow, which is great to see.
 A couple of updates.
 Well, hopefully, not a surprise for everybody, but the HIP passed.
 And so what is all about today?
 So, again, I wanted to thank one more time everybody for the participation,
 both in Discord and outside of Discord, and the conversation.
 Then, again, it's still very open and still very much in flight for many of the things that passed the HIP per se,
 but the HIP was a good first step.
 That's the way I put it on.
 That's the way I said it many times.
 It was just a step one of an end statement with many steps in between.
 So this is good to hear that.
 What we want to talk about today is the next steps regarding the council formation.
 So let me get into this first, and then we can take some of the questions.
 All right, so as we would like to start with the nomination process, so here's how we are going to do.
 So essentially today, we are going to open the nomination for the council.
 That is just the beginning of the process.
 We'll create a public channel in which anybody can nominate themselves for the council.
 The way it works is that you will declare your candidacy publicly in this council.
 Then you will submit a concise bio and history with Helium in that channel.
 The reason why we think it's important is because, of course, that helps people decide who to vote.
 I would imagine that some of the people that are interested in the council are people that are already known to the community,
 but maybe there are other people that are being interested and being attracted to,
 they've been in the ecosystem and maybe they've been a little quieter on the general channels and things like that.
 So we would like for that to be open in that way.
 So yeah, there's going to be a new channel.
 People can submit their bio and their history with Helium in that channel.
 The idea is to start the voting process on Monday, next Monday.
 So the reason why, you know, in the HIP, there was discussion about thresholds and what not for being part of the council.
 I think that there is really no much upside to do that gating at this stage as much as it is to be open and the vote being transparent about who are we voting in.
 Which means that the nomination process should be open enough for people to be able to gather consensus and to do their own, you know,
 campaign sounds too heavy, but really that's what it is to essentially steer consensus towards a candidate or another.
 So voting starting next Monday will last for five days.
 And then once the vote is complete, the Nova Labs team will need, because as you know from the HIP, there is a CPA document with an NDA that needs to be signed between Nova Labs and this council member.
 After the voting is concluded, the Helium team can verify, will verify the eligible candidates with, you know, an identity verification process.
 Because again, this is important for, we need to sign a legally binding document and so that will be part of like an applicable background check and identity verification with a with a prospective council member.
 And if the candidate for whatever reason is rejected in that stage,
 Nova Labs will provide a high level explanation of why that happened and they will move on into the next candidate in the stack ranking of the vote.
 Once the council has been fully vetted and the CPA is being signed, then we can schedule the first seating of the council.
 And right now the target for that first meeting is July 20th.
 We would like for that to be in that in that schedule there.
 And of course to me would be a function of all this, all this process.
 And then from there, then you can read in the HIP, that's where the, you know, the first two weeks period starts for the council to review the documentation with Nova, work with Nova on anything that needs to be worked on.
 And essentially getting to the next step of the process, which will be, you know, disbursement of the mint and the council and the council and the council and Nova collaboration on that.
 I'm trying to figure out if I lost anything.
 But yeah, long story short, it's like nomination today, voting Monday, five days after that, quick identity verification from Nova on the candidate that's the one and the five.
 And if there is anything that if one gets rejected and we go into the next and then there's the first sitting on July 20th.
 So hopefully that's pretty straightforward in terms of in terms of project process.
 Yeah, just to add in once we we will get that new council channel opened up today.
 Yeah, we'll put in a template for folks to include their bio history with helium justification of why they're a good pick for the council.
 And then we will also link to the participation agreement and roles and responsibilities since anybody who is looking to get elected should make sure they review those documents.
 All right, I see Siegfried's typing, but this is an appropriate point to pause if there are questions from the community right now on stage.
 Drop in chat will address questions as best we can.
 But I think Mario laid out kind of the the next two to three weeks of timeline and what that's going to look like.
 So anybody wants to jump up on stage pop questions in chat now would be the time.
 That's what we're here for.
 Just waiting for folks to type in. This is riveting at this point in the discussion.
 Yeah, let me. There is one question I see. I see Ferby and Siegfried. So let me go let me go let me address the first one.
 There was a long discussion on in the general channel around if the council member will be able to sell those tokens, for example, to Nova in order to address things like tax liability and and
 things like tax liability on the payouts that come from the from the from the part of the mint that is reserved for the mint for the council.
 So I internally review that. And while we can not Nova cannot be a permanent buyer for the council member, however, we can definitely entertain OTC sale on an ad hoc basis.
 And, you know, the rules about MNPI inside of trending risk are commensurate with, you know, with any type of similar role with that type of information access.
 So I guess what I'm trying to say is that the way we see is that it's actually pretty balanced the way that is written.
 And also, as I already commented this in general, the definition of MNPI and the way people buy people act on that and they define that MNPI or not. It's pretty much the way we wrote it in there is the same way that every company does it.
 Especially in the crypto in this in this regulatory environment. So specifically the question about is Nova can buy the council, the council HNT. The answer is yes, we can on an ad hoc basis, but we don't want to create like a standing facility for that because it just it becomes part of a process that it really makes muddies the water greatly.
 And it's it just does it from a legal standpoint is something that we are not ready to do on a standing basis. That being said, if there are specific OTC sales that we can discuss maybe around taxes and things like that, like we can we can discuss that with the council and we are open to it.
 But we don't want to create like a standing permanent buyer situation for Nova for council for council HNT.
 Will the voting be yes no for each candidate with one candidate to be automatically elected just because number of candidates are less than seats to be filled. So maybe I'll tap on Marc Nijdam's shoulder for that one. Yeah, in the in the channel as well.
 Yeah, it's okay. Like it basically we're gonna run the same process as the mobile working group, which everybody already understands and our governance system also already supports. It fits the thing quite well and basically we get all this all the submissions get, get, get put up, there's a there's a top end vote that will get that will run an essential end up with a stack ranking of all people that have been voted that have been voted on.
 And based on that we'll start we can start filling filling seats using that process that you described.
 Hopefully that answered the question.
 There's a question with does the floor price go into effect? Marc Nijdam answered already.
 Yeah, basically this is the security review that the implementation of the contract work is complete the oracles were deployed yesterday for both IoT and mobile, which I'm sure people people noticed PoC is no longer in effect rewards are no longer in effect for either mobile and IoT.
 On the IT side, the, the PoC rewards end up in the IT operations fund which will help fund the ongoing operations and maintenance of all the regional routers, the mobile oracles, and about half an engineering head to to help help maintain that that system current and up to running and up and running.
 We are currently going through security review for the on chain work. That's usually the longest poll we're trying to get that completed as soon as possible the group we work with us pretty quick.
 So we hope to get that done. Hope to get that done shortly I can't give an exact date, I'm going to guess within the next week or two but we'll see what findings they come back with that we need to address.
 Thank you, Marc. Yeah, that's very important. I guess you can imagine any type of smart contract change and going through that it's it's that process very important.
 On.
 Since we wait for other questions.
 I don't know how much you follow that some of the tech news out there but you can see that there is a mounting interest from from Starlink into starting a mobile offering.
 You might if you look, look around, not even hard enough you can see there is articles that covers Starlink talking to some of the cable operators about, like, there is one last week it was about Spectrum and Charter about launching a mobile why is it important
 why I'm mentioning is because if you remember a couple of town halls ago we were talking about the role of satellites as a catalyst for Wi-Fi offload.
 I, I think that Starlink talking to the cable operators it's interesting because the cable operators are the ones that actually made Wi-Fi offload that's part of this strategy from day one for offering mobile services.
 And so, it just a further confirmation that when people like Starlink not in the mobile world started to think about offering, having a mobile offering, they are talking to the people there.
 They are leveraging heavily Wi-Fi offload for their offering I mean charter spectrum is called the mobile offering for charter they claim to offload over 95% of their traffic on on Wi-Fi.
 And again, there is nothing for us necessarily there as much as this to confirm that one of the things that we said that that's like, don't think that mobile offering from a satellite company means that Wi-Fi will not be will not be important is
 is actually the exact opposite I think it will probably come with an embedded Wi-Fi offloaded engine. When they launched once once they launched their service. So, just something as of what if you want a curiosity of something that was out there.
 Can we get some general updates on the network Mambo Mexico any, any exciting new stuff.
 Yes, so on the let me start from, from Brazil and Mambo.
 We continue to have this proof of concept in the lab. We are in commercial negotiation already with with two active commercial negotiations over there, which are ongoing, and I can learn how I can share the names.
 But essentially that the technical trials are going really well they're all interested in into the both the quality, like I mentioned on on the on the journal channel, the symbiosis between an offload per se and the quality that comes with that offload
 for both of these, both of these opportunities. They are looking at an offload with that with that lens, specifically one of them is an MNO one of the biggest MNO in the country they've done passpoint in the past, unsuccessfully meaning they were no happy with it with the quality that they
 were seeing passpoint in 20 in 2018. What I call the first wave of passpoint which was 2018 2019.
 And now, instead we're going back at it with this idea of quality first passpoint and that's how we got them engaged so it's good to see nothing nothing to publicly announced that all I can say is that there's definitely a lot of interest and this is beyond all the technical trial
 that we have with all the other carriers in the country they're still ongoing, but we have two active commercial conversations over there in Mexico.
 So, as you already posted something but in the chat Movistar started a text based campaign for people for their subscriber around the expansion zone. They asked us to change some to produce specific data that Joey Hiller and our team has produced
 regarding this expansion zone and where the potential for expansion in the future will be the campaigns are going really well the opening range is pretty high.
 As I say, all the Android, all the Android OEMs that they have relationship with, and they have an Android versions above 11, they received their carrier bundle update, and they can already use the network that we have the U.S. carrier AT&T that is using the
 network in Mexico today. There are other there are three carriers that we are engaged as well in Mexico to to being added to the roster.
 And, and you know conversation continue to go on the both. One of them the technical trial is complete we're going into commercial discussions, but as you might imagine a country like going through that through the workup.
 There's been a lot of shifting into in the little in the past three to four weeks in terms of network towards the what the workup is bringing and in a way is actually bringing data points to the conversation.
 But yeah, I mean nothing again same thing in Mexico nothing to publicly announced but not none of those opportunities is going on and I'll say if that's the case but none of those opportunities going out of the window.
 And they're just progressing with the telco speed that characterizes that this vertical.
 On the one more thing on the new exciting stuff. I mentioned in the past that we are preparing this launch of this enablement platform.
 The team at helium and Nova Labs is being working to try to maximize the impact of their launch, hopefully in the next between between now at the end of July we can, we can gather under the, under the, you know, launched the way we want to and then
 the changes to the website and things like that so more to come on that platform but the reason why it's important as you're hopefully it's clear enough from what I said about Mexico and Brazil is that that platform is bringing more carriers to offload into the network.
 So when I when I know just saying, just for the sake of saying that symbiotic relationship within the two. Oh, we also go on the US side of 1500 more target from one of the carrier, the same carrier they gave us a 30,000.
 Now we have 1500 more, and the team, Joey Hiller and the team are loading it up on on world.
 There was a discussion.
 There is a discussion about tiering and and discussion about different venues in the general channel about week ago. I think that once the dust settles on the council and the council is seated and, and we continue you know we start the conversations.
 It is, I think it's kind of important that we also get to talk about tiers, having a specific definition that is agreed with one of the carrier at least. And the reason why you're bringing that up because as we all agreed on.
 We want the network to grow on the amount of data that gets offloaded to grow and needs to be aligned where the dollar value resonates with it with the carriers and so tearing is definitely one of them is not the only one.
 I want to be very clear as you as you might, as you can see those 30,000 locations, some of them are what we consider tier three and they're still very much important for whether it's the carrier that gave us that target so it's not just tier in terms of venue type.
 That's why it's hard to implement. Like there is actually tearing that is not just on venue sides is also an interest from carrier.
 But we have to collectively start thinking about in that direction and I know the other projects out there thinking about it the same.
 I'm not well aware I read everything has probably spend way too much time reading everything.
 I know I know that this is important also for others but I can tell you from our perspective.
 We need to we need to execute it in a way that is much more pointed and much more aligned with what the carrier wants and that's how we win.
 Is there an age of tiers in terms of pricing.
 Yes, we do.
 And he's evolving. That's the other part that that that that is changing and evolving with some of those tiers.
 They give you an example a tier three a tier three, without putting numbers here, but tier three last year.
 There was no part of expansion zone and now it is part of an expansion zone. You have a 30% appreciation price, for example.
 So if you have one of you have a small restaurant a small coffee shop in an expansion zone in world that the carriers values that location about 30% more in price than if it's not an expansion zone.
 So I know that is not exactly what you were looking for probably as an answer but that's what I can tell.
 Does the, does volume of data and number of people connecting impact price.
 Depending on what price you talk about right. Yeah.
 Price as if like the carrier price.
 Okay, good. So yes, the carrier price so the carrier prices.
 Let me say differently.
 It impacts the carrier price for us as an organization as a whole as a network, meaning like the more data and the more number of people we connect the more contractual leverage we gain with the carriers and.
 The more we inside that definition that general definition, the more we can execute in the places geographical places where they are pointing us to the greater is the contractual leverage as well.
 So if we're talking price it means that once we get to renewal of those contracts.
 If all of a sudden we are able to cover 1% of those expansion zone. There's a different type of leverage that you can create in those in those relationships.
 Anybody is not like we're trying to trick anybody is just the way it's normal, very normal enterprise like you get you were given a challenge you, you execute on the channel you land and expand.
 So, this needs to go of course with a cat with a global catalyst. So on one end we need to execute. So there is a micro there is a macro from a micro perspective helium and the carrier we need to execute to where it matters to them.
 That's number one, once we execute there, assuming and the macro catalyst also plays out like the space, the scarcity of the spectrum, the fixed wireless access that needs to offload mobile subscribers, and I'll know once the student connect, then that's where you can have a change.
 That's what we think what we think is a thesis that's what the price will change. But this, both of things needs to happen at the same time, and they're happening for what is worth they're happening. When you look at the those 30,000 and now more than 30,000 location.
 You know that, again as I say like a tier three appreciating 30% there it's it's it's pretty significant.
 That's between Nova and the carrier who paid and, and, and, which is basically what Mario is talking about like where the carrier, the carrier has certain rates that they have certain caps that they may pay more for higher tier locations they may write that they, they may pay, and they may actually
 develop with users depending on the tier or the location or the carrier for that matter. So that's a billing relationship. Number one, the second one is what the network charges the payer, which is like the carrier Nova, in this case, and that is that relationship is based on a, you know, aggregate
 base for a gigabyte per unique for a unique user. And then the third billing relationship is between the deployer and the network, where the network basically pays out pays out rewards to the, to the, to the deployers or hotspots for doing the work so there's
 this layer has its own set of rules that go around that and I think the what what baby Billy and Mario are talking about was like the top, the top of that funnel. So there's definitely there's definitely ways that that is changing like we're working on some tiering updates that
 can help with that right so we can if we can improve the that whole funnel, based on based on tiers that will be good for the players and good for the for the network because it helps the aggregate price go up and it helps the billing relationship with the carrier and
 the leverage with the carrier go up.
 I wanted to say that I think it's important. And this will be discussed with the council with more information to be shared in the forum. We're playing, we're playing a little bit of a balancing game here right, because
 we could expose all the complexity of that or of that hearing and that contracts straight to the community but we often, I mean we heard this before that if it is too complex to understand that nobody is very hard to to have participation.
 So on one end is, where do we draw the line between simplicity of participation and complete alignment with all that, with all the mechanics and small mechanics of how this contrast of structure.
 Where do you draw that line. That's number one balancing act the second balancing act is about future because we're also planning for the future, because if we, if we just stay in our lane, and we only only completely obey one to one to those, those
 complexity of the contrast today without trying to play some strategic bets into the future, then it also doesn't work so the balancing act is, how much do we support and sustain where we think is going to be the future need of the carrier, versus
 what they need today, and how much of that complexity gets passed from the traditional dollar relationship between, you know, between helium and and and and Nova Labs and the rest of the deployment.
 It's, it's a, I tell you, it's not a black and white. It's just not, it can be a black and white because if it was a black and white and I don't think it will be, we will have a conversation, it's, it's much more nuanced than that.
 But that's where the game is, and I would say the reason for I already mentioned this before so I can say that again. The reason why some of this contract relationship they are being multiples in terms of sides.
 Year after years because we play some strategic bets, and we made the participation easier in a way that grew that the growth happen in specific places. And so that now is paying off in a different way.
 This is true for example in Mexico is one of the example my use in the US as well, where, you know, there was, you know, there was a foundation grant for Mexico the beginning and then it became a Nova grant and then, and now we have that footprint being offered
 to us carriers they're like oh wow that's great and now we have the same us carriers looking at the Brazil footprint. So it's like placing those strategic bets in a way that it's almost like anticipating without overexposing our self future needs, versus
 if we played like operational, operationalizing what we do it on a one to one relationship with the complexity of the contract with the carrier. That is where the balancing act is. So, I'm sure this will be part of the discussion that we'll have within the council,
 but also with the community as much as we can do to expose that.
 By the way, I'm very bullish, I'm extremely bullish on what we're doing. And I continue to be extremely bullish every day that I see carriers giving us like thousands of location to cover is that is extremely bullish.
 Maybe we navigate that. Why are we trying to be in a sustainable way of course, and for the long run. I read it said is in the previous call. If you're expecting this to be a three months right, you probably are in the wrong project.
 Anyway, we're looking at three to five years down the road like two to three years for the men's but when I see that the full macro catalyst on revolving is going to be a three to five years out in the US.
 Okay, there is a question sorry from Tommy Mario Did you see the discussion about allowing people to pay to use the network in places like airports. If they are not on a partner carrier.
 There's one below that too, by the way, for example, they pay a certain amount of time and a certain amount of data. I thought it was a really interesting idea for increasing network usage especially night traffic pay places with lots of international travelers.
 Okay, so my understanding is essentially the idea is that let's say we have deployments in an airport. And we do have specific carrier partners of course they're already automatically offloading, but you have people they are not part of those carriers,
 let's say a Verizon subscriber just to play safe. And we will, we could allow Verizon subscriber to pay to have some sort of captive portal of I guess to pay for usage and being connected.
 It's, I, it's an idea. I, if you, they hear the hesitancy that you hear in my voice is because captive portals captive portals are thing that it's quickly very very quickly, disappearing from from the Wi-Fi from the Wi-Fi market like I know that we all see it around us
 that if you look behind, if you have any conversation with any executive on the Wi-Fi side they're, they're running away from them as quickly as they can possibly can.
 That is the hesitancy is like, oh, because one of the value proposition that we bring for Helium with this seamless connectivity, right, the moment that's the connectivity is not seamless doesn't detract from, from our.
 I mean it's about that we can think of, maybe there is vehicles like apps, maybe we can have Passpoint profile being delivered via apps that anybody can download and at that point it would be seamless but then the payouts will come straight from the user.
 We had this conversation many times with the team about using the Helium wallet for example as a way for paying for traffic for your own traffic.
 It's a little bit more complicated than what it looks when it comes to actually do the settlement, because you can prepay for data, necessarily.
 So, what I wanted to say is that I think it's interesting it's more complex than what it looks in terms of implementation, and I'm a little worried about the seamless part, unless we use an app for as a vehicle for carrying that profile.
 It's not a bad idea, like there is a lot of people that we don't serve that actually with carriers, and would it be interested for them to connect to this network if they had an app.
 I mean, openly, you can see, there is some.
 There's a company called purple.
 You can look it up.
 They have an app called purple connect they're an MSP in the country, and they are going. They have a different go to market strategy with like advertising on their app, but they allow you to connect to different Wi-Fi where they have agreements in place.
 So there is things like that are a little more closer than a capital portal. And by the way, purple was a capital portal company, and now they are they are like, they are, I would say, quickly changing the body proposition into the market.
 So, yeah, I think we can, we can definitely entertain that idea is just I'm a little worried about the delivery method, and how to support the delivery method.
 It's also certainly like, it's certainly in large venues, there's also, you know, there's many if you the user has to do any work at all. There's usually already mechanisms there right in an airport, I can use their captive portal and free Wi-Fi to like get internet access.
 Yeah, that's really gets. He gets complicated from there. Because you have the pushback of people say, Oh, I go automatically connected and build, build, because I have the app, but at the same time, I could have connected the airport Wi-Fi when I walked in, for example, but that is there is that concern about the user experience but I got it.
 Thank you for bringing it up to me that's a very good. It's a it's a good, it's a good input.
 What can be done to assure the broader community.
 That the token will actually be fixed supply long term investors and sneakers will not participate in a token that will be continuously inflated, and they are no needed to support token price and therefore deployers and network.
 I said, I mean, we said it all I let me say, I'm not anything about it for a second.
 Because there is like five seconds answer and there is like a five minute answer.
 The reason why the mint was structured in this way is because we believe that the thesis will play out in a specific amount of time.
 There is no interest for anyone into meant more than what is needed to reach that that thesis. And so as far as alignment from the team.
 And those are the conversation that we're having as well with other investors, crypto investors. So, this is not the idea that the continuously inflated parties.
 I completely push back on that because I don't think there is any interesting continuously inflated.
 At the same time, I think we can't write black and white that this would never be ever, ever, ever. Like, there's no the way. I mean, I would honestly I couldn't be credible to just say that, because you never know I think I mentioned before, maybe the US government issues a grant for building six G network with a $40 billion or like a $200 billion grant, and then slows down the pieces, a couple of more years, what do we do that.
 Like, do we wait we like, there is a lot of externalities that we can't anticipate so I guess the right way to answer is assuming that externalities all the project do not change.
 There is no interest from the team into use the mint mechanism to just literally survive that's no why the mint was done. This is no why the mint is there the mint is there to bring this project forward for the next two to three years for those catalysts to fully realized.
 And so I get that is that is the way you have conversation with investors also, let's also be clear on one thing. I don't know, I don't know this, I don't know you this the person to put the question so when you have conversation with investors everybody takes a risk.
 If there is no risk is not called investment. So, you can have a thesis, you can have a goal. If you ever been in the startup world and you do a pitch you have what you think is going to go, and then things inevitably change from there that doesn't mean that we're going to inflate
 again all I'm saying is that what we can capture is what we have today is a thesis that plays out in two to three years. This is what we're doing this week community with this meant this what we're trying to accomplish with these operations.
 If that externality changes then you adopt that you change and maybe become an equity raise another time you know what I mean like this, it's impossible to have that black and white answer, even an investment scenario there was is not called an investment that is always
 risk associated. If there is such a thing as a zero risk then I think, let's not call it what it is, it will be something else.
 Even in a government bonds have their own risk in a way in the fluctuation of the rates but anyway, I all I'm saying is that there is, we can maybe what we can say is that we can be more vocal about the father, this is what we, what we're advocating
 today I said it multiple times before. I hope that that thesis plays out earlier so that we actually don't even meant meant meant the entire amount to use the entire amount I think that should be the goal.
 Nobody agrees with that. So, that's my answer.
 There's a question that we missed from Greens that replace macro coverage in Mexico, the same as movie star or is it more targeted like in the US.
 No, the reason is Mexico and Canada are part of their data plan.
 And so essentially, the way it works with many my understanding at least the many of the plans that they have. They include the data in Mexico and Canada, and by as you might imagine once you're in Mexico or in Canada, you're doing roaming agreements with, with
 local carriers to carry that traffic so for them, it's much more widespread that is in the US because they don't own the network. And I know that people will say there is AT&T Mexico but if you look the way they operate they're like completely independent
 even though they have the same like general ownership. So, there's roaming agreements essentially that AT&T uses in those countries. And I think using Wi-Fi it's it is. It can be in some areas and I know that it's going to sound like I'm dodging I'm not by this, it can be in some area.
 It's much more cheaper to use a Wi-Fi network of that it is to use a roaming agreement in other areas might not be because maybe they have a bilateral roaming agreement.
 But for the places where they don't have using Wi-Fi is actually a cheaper proposition for them. So it's much more widespread to go back the answer to green is like is no is different than the US is much more widespread that's why today in Mexico.
 If JP here's something that is not correct. Today, if you deploy in Mexico a unit as soon as is validated as this coverage blah blah blah AT&T gets that that carrier gets automatically turned on.
 As of today.
 I'm just waiting to see if we got anything else that comes in here I got a few folks typing.
 Don't need to be shy if anybody wants to jump up on stage.
 Anyway, while waiting for folks to finish again right after the this town hall concludes we'll get that council channel up and live.
 We'll relink the participation agreements the roles responsibilities and access docs will be in there template for folks to yourself nominate or anybody is welcome to nominate somebody else within the community, assuming they are agreeing to that.
 Thank you guys.
 Wait and see unless there's
 Jenny if Bobby's in for it you can nominate him in that council channel.
 I don't see one more minute for any other questions from Mario and Marc. Thank you guys both for you know when this from a council discussion to a little bit of a network update which I think is fantastic we want to continue to do these things be available.
 Yeah, one thing I wanted to say, I do want to say a couple of things. The first one is that I, because I know that, unfortunately, the medium that we use for communicate unfortunately in a good way is good there is a synchronous like this cord but the when a synchronous
 mechanism I use usually there is assumption that comes with it so the father sometimes you see me, more or less in the general channel doesn't mean that I'm not caught up.
 I'm actually trying to cut up a catch up as much as possible. Usually myself mark night and Joey Hiller we kind of talk about what is the biggest thing that has been in the discuss in general.
 I just wanted to say that I just in general if you think that we're not paying we are like I am absolutely pay attention to everything that is going on personally and Marc is the same so I would love.
 As we progress I would love of course more ideas like the Tommy's idea was a great like honestly, it was great to discuss that idea that I don't know the capabilities of doing it how that will play out but I guess it's the, the.
 We need to be able to be always committed to that committed to the to the thesis, and any idea that comes through that I would just encourage everybody to do, you know, come up with any idea that you might have in for more participation
 in how we are we grow the network better and we do things better from a perspective of like deployers standpoint I do hope that the council ends up with a good balance between deployers, and another way.
 Also I hate that too I hate that we say like token holders and deployers like the employers can be a token holder and token holder can also be a deployer, but I do hope that we have an healthy balance in the, in the council of people that have experience
 both the deployment side as well as you know just token holding, and it's important because we do need that that their balance, and going back to the general channel in general, as you know it's it's challenging projects like this.
 We need an infinite amount of commitment and time for everybody involved so and everybody that spends time in the general channel commenting and interacting with community is my deepest respect, because that's without that that we wouldn't have a project.
 So, we wouldn't have the network part I just want to encourage everybody to have like constructive ideas to keep bringing them into the channel.
 If I'm not there today I might be there tomorrow and if I'm not there today I'm probably hear from Marc what happened on Discord yesterday so don't feel like if you put an idea over there and you don't get anything back from the team.
 That isn't being ignored is not being ignored it's just that, as you might imagine, we are also continued operationally we need to a lot of things to operationalize internally.
 It just for me just a call for like even more participation in the in the channel and I hope that we can do even a better job on our end to continue to foster that participation.
 All right, it looks like we have just kind of look at the chat and looks like we've kind of gone back in a general mode around discussion. I had put out the last couple questions I think Mario that's a good note to end on for today.
 Discussion general council channel coming within the hour look forward to the nominations the discussion voting will kick off next week. Anything else, we will be in and out of discord where we're still out building and trying to grow this network.
 Thank you everybody appreciate everybody to take the time.
 See you on Discord.
 Okay, make sure.